Comments on: Moose with role already attached http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/2009/07/25/moose-with-role-already-attached/ my ramblings on life, work & anything left in-between Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:28:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Changing MooseX::SingletonMethod (a little bit!) « transfixed but not dead! http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/2009/07/25/moose-with-role-already-attached/#comment-751 Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:00:35 +0000 http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/?p=493#comment-751 [...] having posted my last little ditty on having role attached to Moose I thought I make some slight amendments to MooseX::SingletonMethod module to pull this slightly [...]

]]> By: draegtun http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/2009/07/25/moose-with-role-already-attached/#comment-750 Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:33:39 +0000 http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/?p=493#comment-750 Thanks John.

Re: MooseX::Declare… Yes I wonder how this would work to ;-)

Getting into Devel::Declare is on my (long!) list of things todo. I guess we need to be able to tell MX::Declare to use a different base class which could look like this?….

use MooseX::Declare (base_class => ‘MyMoose’);

/I3az/

]]> By: john napiorkowski http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/2009/07/25/moose-with-role-already-attached/#comment-748 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:47:32 +0000 http://transfixedbutnotdead.com/?p=493#comment-748 Really useful and clear! Thanks. I wonder how this works with MooseX::Declare….

]]>